|
river-wind
May 20, 2003
03:35 GMT
|
cool angles. good exposure.
|
|
rer
May 20, 2003
02:23 GMT
|
Nice pic. Long shutter speeds can do some really neat things. I can see the variations in the water speed.
|
|
May 19, 2003 23:59 GMT |
--- End of voting --- |
|
|
John Payne
May 19, 2003
02:02 GMT
|
DOH! That should have been opinion NOT opion.
|
|
|
John Payne
May 19, 2003
01:10 GMT
|
Thanks Mark_A. I wasn't sure about the "slowness" myself but it was the best of the bunch that I took that day. Certainly the diagonals add to the impression of motion - and not just my opion now - he-he.
|
|
Mark_A
May 19, 2003
00:12 GMT
|
oops let that go too fast ... like also the main entry and exit points of the water across the rectangle .. nicely composed imho
|
|
Mark_A
May 19, 2003
00:10 GMT
|
works well .. perhaps a bit too slow for my own taste but its movement all right !! :-)
|
|
|
John Payne
May 18, 2003
13:53 GMT
|
Just realised I haven't replied to SuperScott - lets's just say I think you're right!!
|
|
|
John Payne
May 18, 2003
13:52 GMT
|
Thanks shudder that was my intention.
|
|
shudder
May 18, 2003
04:10 GMT
|
I think this pic transcends the usual furry water kind of shot very well, and I especially like the motion and angle of the water. This is one of my favorites and so I rated it very high in my vote. Well done for taking a usual kind of shot and making it unusual in the way you did it.
|
|
|
John Payne
May 17, 2003
21:35 GMT
|
Bugs - Thanks for the comments The perceived fuzziness may just be the result of the size reduction, I tried to make it small enough for most people to view the pic without having to scroll the screen.
|
|
Bugs
May 17, 2003
18:45 GMT
|
I rather like the combination of blur and stability, although the rock looks just a tiny bit fuzzy to me.
|
|
SuperScott
May 17, 2003
16:00 GMT
|
Gorgeous!
|
